By Alison Taylor
Whistler’s boundary expansion is in jeopardy given the regional district’s plans to move forward with a rezoning on the resort’s northern edge said Mayor Ken Melamed this week.
A meeting has been scheduled with the province next month to determine how Whistler can get a boundary expansion to the north despite an active rezoning of those lands by the board of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District.
“The (SLRD) board threw another wrench into the (boundary expansion) process,” said a frustrated mayor this week. “The province is not in the habit of granting boundary expansions while anything is in process.”
Originally the meeting with the province was set up to discuss how the land, which has been approved for 64 estate homes, would transition from regional district lands to municipal lands, said the mayor.
Last month, however, the SLRD board supported plans to rezone the land, which will allow the development to go from 64 homes to 108.
That prompted Whistler council’s decision to immediately withdraw funding from the regional district, straining relations further between the two local governments over this contentious issue.
It also raised questions about the long-awaited boundary expansion, one of Whistler’s main Olympic legacies.
Developers of the Green River Estates said they are caught in the middle of a disagreement between the SLRD and the resort municipality and are simply trying to get what they believe they are entitled to under the existing zoning on their 600-acre parcel of land.
They can build 108 homes on the land according to the current zoning said developer David Ehrhardt.
“We don’t need any blessing from anybody to do that,” he said this week.
“The facts are that there is a density that is permitted under the existing zoning.”
That may be the case said Melamed if the land was in the Prairies, meaning it was flat and could be neatly subdivided.
In this case however the developer’s 600 acres stretches on both sides of Highway 99 north of Whistler.
The western portion of land, according to a SLRD staff report, is “practically un-developable.”
Melamed’s immediate response to Ehrhardt’s assertion that they can build 108 homes is: “No they can’t.
“Obviously it’s very clear that the zoning doesn’t allow for 108 lots otherwise they wouldn’t be applying to have it rezoned. If they could, why don’t they?”
Under the Bare Land Strata Act, it is possible to put a
development in a smaller footprint and maximize a site’s full potential in a
process called “density averaging.”