Growing up in Toronto, perpetually stuck in construction-related traffic jams, my dad always broke out the same joke — “it’ll be a great city, if they ever get it finished.”
When I was too young to recognize sarcasm, I actually believed that dad was speaking truthfully and that it was possible to finish Toronto; that somebody had a master blueprint somewhere and ticked off the projects one after another. Some day the pavers would lay the last inch of asphalt, and the work crews would hand in their hard hats and orange vests and disappear forever.
I liked the idea then, and I like it even more now. If you think about it, that’s the very definition of sustainability — you set your limits and you live within them. That means there should be a set number of people, living in a set number of houses, working a set number of jobs, and leaving what’s left of the environment alone. No more draining wetlands or cutting down trees to build subdivisions.
The problem is that our economy is hardwired to growth, and a lot of our growth is the result of a growing population and our constant need to build new homes, sell new cars, and provide more products and services.
Whistler believes that it can buck this economic reality, and back in the 1970s the municipality created a bed cap — a formula that determined the maximum number of people Whistler could house. The bed cap formula has been adjusted a few times and changed to exempt employee restricted units, but Whistler at least remains committed to the concept.
We’re now closing in on the cap. By the time the Olympics and Paralympics have come and gone, all but a few hundred bed units will be accounted for.
At the same time, Whistler’s infrastructure is nearing completion.
Our new municipal library opens on Jan. 26, after giving residents a sneak preview this past Sunday at Books on the Move. Members of the community were given a chance to take a book from the old library, walk it over the new facility and place it on the shelf. The new library is still very much under construction, and lines of marking tape prevented more than 200 participants from wandering around, but the general sentiment from the people I talked to was that it was about time that Whistler had a proper library instead of a modified portable. There were concerns about the costs nearly doubling in two years, but most people were accepting — what’s done is done, and no amount of complaining is going to get that money back. It’s still a great and important building.